3 ms·
One known risk is improper component selection and it can ruin your "open" stance in the eyes of potential customers. For example, if you need 802.11 WiFi compo
by jcr 12y ago
One known risk is improper component selection and it can ruin your "open"
stance in the eyes of potential customers. For example, if you need 802.11
WiFi component in your design, then picking the wrong one can
result in being under an NDA, not having the freely available documentation
needed by open source hacker to write and maintain drivers, and other
"closed" nonsense from component vendors that prevents your openness.
This issue is particularly true for most all graphics chips/cores.
As for examples of open-hardware, there are many, but you'll need to search
them out and read through the carefully to determine how "open" they really
are. Like most buzzwords, "open" gets tossed around too loosely. Both finding
and evaluating open-hardware vendors is time consuming.
There are also variations of "open-hardware" in some places like China.
Andrew (bunnie) Huang calls the Chinese variation “gongkai” (公开).
http://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=3040 http://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=3040
- poseid 12y agoThanks, so, some people should start building open-source gaphic cards or wifi chips? Well, ok, I understand this is not so easy with today's tools and processes, but maybe one day in the future. What about less complex devices, like simpler PCB boards? I saw tindie.com and a number of people having projects at kickstarter.com - what/how do these projects into sustainable income? Is it services? Is it on-demand production? Or, Adafruit is maybe interesting to look at, since they offer the community/shop driven approach? Thanks a lot!