3 ms·
I disliked the pseudonym policy itself, I found it to be a puzzling policy considering how immigrant-filled the tech industry is, and Google too. I was born in
by potatolicious 12y ago
I disliked the pseudonym policy itself, I found it to be a puzzling policy considering how immigrant-filled the tech industry is, and Google too.
I was born in a different country, with a different name. I operate with an anglicized name, which took years to become my legal name. There was a long period where the name everyone knew me as wasn't my legal one. Nowadays my legal name isn't the same name used by family members on a different continent.
Names are fluid, they're significant but ultimately just identifiers to tell us apart. I find the notion that there is a One True Name to be laughably geocentric and completely out of place in a social network (as opposed to say, the IRS).
For me the pseudonym policy was a minor annoyance, making me wonder just how culturally homogenous a team of product people have to be to cook it up. For others it has been much more damaging - trans people outed being probably the most memorable one, though not the only case where an idiotic policy has had unexpectedly severe consequences.
- judk 12y agoThe SVP of Google who invented G+ used an anglicized pseudonym (approxinym?) from the start.
- vidarh 12y agoIt puzzling also because in a tech company, surely there would have been a large number of people with experience from various communities who would know people primarily by a handle, and realise that in many sub-cultures people would be unable to connect with people they know very well if they were forced to use real names. There are people who have known each other for decades that know each other by e.g. demo-scene handle only. In which case their real name has an anonymizing effect to the people they want to connect to online.