> If you think universal access is important, and net neutrality is important, you have to be willing to publicly subsidize the construction of telecom infrastr

> If you think universal access is important, and net neutrality is important, you have to be willing to publicly subsidize the construction of telecom infrastructure. Indeed, why isn't anyone willing to take this logic as far as it should go? Publicly funded highways have facilitated trillions of dollars of economic activity. How much more growth could be enabled via publicly subsidized gigabit fiber?