3 ms·
I was just asserting the fact that terrorists do take pictures of their targets quite frequently. I am just as opposed to profiling photographers as you are. A
by phaus 12y ago
I was just asserting the fact that terrorists do take pictures of their targets quite frequently.
I am just as opposed to profiling photographers as you are. After all, a terrorist taking a picture of a landmark is probably going to look exactly like any other tourist.
Edit: All of the down-votes in the world won't change reality. Just because you personally don't have access to evidence that terrorists conduct photographic surveillance doesn't mean that no one does.
- learc83 12y ago>All of the down-votes in the world won't change reality. Just because you personally don't have access to evidence that terrorists conduct photographic surveillance doesn't mean that no one does. I didn't downvote you, but are you asserting that this evidence exists or just that it might? If so, what is your basis for thinking this?
- phaus 12y agoI'm asserting that the evidence exists and that I have seen it. Before I saw it, I never for an instant doubted that it was happening. To further clarify, because some others (not you) seem confused, just because terrorists are in fact using photos and videos to plan attacks, doesn't mean that we have to start reporting everyone we see holding a camera in public. Its entirely possible for profiling photographers to be a bad idea even if every single terrorist had a camera.
- learc83 12y agoI'm genuinely curious. Can you point me to this evidence?