4 ms·
Why not just price it as $/month for X transfer, with $/GB above that rate? That'd be simple, transparent, no damage to the market structure of internet busine
by jbooth 12y ago
Why not just price it as $/month for X transfer, with $/GB above that rate? That'd be simple, transparent, no damage to the market structure of internet businesses, no future anti-trust cases, and we're straight-up paying for the infrastructure that we, as consumers, are using.
Is your case that more money would go to network improvements with the backroom deal routine? Have you considered that the backroom deal routine allows a lot more room for pocketing money and not really investing in the network?