4 ms·
The argument against would be that 2.7M articles containing no useful content is not helpful. (Assuming, which I do, that the articles do not contain useful con
by cjensen 12y ago
The argument against would be that 2.7M articles containing no useful content is not helpful. (Assuming, which I do, that the articles do not contain useful content).
- callesgg 12y agoThey contain loots of useful information Here is an article from an earlier comment, https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutriana_repens https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutriana_repens After reading that I know that Bouteloua repens is a form of grass. Who first identified it. Who gave it is current name and some other common names for the plant. I think it is amazing. If someone has already filed in a the information it just seams like a waste of man hours to retype it to Wikipedia.