> end of the road for this one design. Yeah, that's exactly the question I got from reading it. If they are implying the end of the road for this design, does

> end of the road for this one design. Yeah, that's exactly the question I got from reading it. If they are implying the end of the road for this design, does that imply they have a next design? If so, why would they want to redesign? > you want to use components that are recent so you can keep producing more of them without increased costs for legacy components. Good point, didn't think of that. Is this a problem even on their scale?