Let us be honest, if the same work can be accomplished in less time then it suggest less people are needed that are currently employed. The other issue here is

Let us be honest, if the same work can be accomplished in less time then it suggest less people are needed that are currently employed. The other issue here is that only in government could this suggestion float because they really don't have to show a profit, answer to share holders. Don't count to heavily on voters because if this does succeed; why wouldn't it when they set the criteria; they can market it so that anyone opposed is transformed into the guilty party. It is also can cynically be viewed as a means to raise employment because if the work goes unfinished with fewer hours then more people working those fewer hours will be needed