3 ms·
How interesting. For example, this one was recently linked via the Twitter account: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616585674&oldid=615623458 http://en
by silverlight 12y ago
How interesting. For example, this one was recently linked via the Twitter account: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616585674&oldid=615623458 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616585674&oldid=615...
Changing it from "corporate lawyer" to "attorney". I assume that someone believes the latter is more "on message" for the Congressman's campaign efforts.
I imagine most of these edits are similarly innocuous and subtle, but it's interesting to see what things the folks up in Washington think are worth having an intern update to help facilitate their plans.
- x1798DE 12y agoOr things that some staffer was looking up anyway and changed it. Then again, there's something sinister about the minor style change to Step Up 3D's article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616433636&oldid=614980617 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616433636&oldid=61... Probably the anti-community center lobby trying to keep kids from learning to breakdance.
- jjcm 12y agoSome of the edits are far less subtle: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616939061&oldid=614523933#National_conservative_leader http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616939061&oldid=614... The addition sounds like something copy/pasted directly from a campaign flyer. The addition of titles (Congressman), the subjective language (unwavering), and lack of any citations makes it a pretty clear indicator of who edited it and for what purpose. Edit: a quick googling shows that it in fact is copy/pasted directly from his personal site: http://www.huelskamp.org/meettim.html http://www.huelskamp.org/meettim.html
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]