7 ms·

Oh man, I was really hoping for a better CPU. The current one is just so dang slow.

by Nux 12y ago

lmedinas 12y ago
"This isn’t a “Raspberry Pi 2″, but rather the final evolution of the original Raspberry Pi. "[1] I think we can interpret this as RPI 2 will be released soon with a new processor. 1 - http://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/#introducing-raspberry-pi-model-b-plus http://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/#introducing-raspberry-pi-mo...
- ianwootten 12y ago
  Nope, he's stated publicly that any major overhaul isn't likely to see the light of day until 2017. Listen to an interview here: http://www.raspi.today/podcast-episode-6/ http://www.raspi.today/podcast-episode-6/
paulrov 12y ago
They said they would rather people optimise for the current hardware than cause rifts between users. The CPU really isn't that bad if you don't run that behemoth X11 on it.
userbinator 12y ago
Slow and proprietary, which is not a great combination... there's a lot of interesting new ARM SoCs from China that are coming out, like the Allwinner A3x series (quad A7s, >1GHz). It would be pretty unlikely for one of those to show up in the next Pi though; if anything, it'll probably be another Broadcom.
- goldenkey 12y ago
  Ebon Upton [0], one of the main folk from the Raspberry Pi foundation works for Broadcom and does SoC. So odds are slim considering that connection probably enabled them to get extreme price arrangements otherwise not doable. [0] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi_Foundation http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi_Foundation
  - WatchDog 12y ago
    His Broadcom relationship is probably much less relevant now that the foundation has some money in the bank and a product that has achieved wide spread success.
    - fnordfnordfnord 12y ago
      Exactly, there shouldn't be any trouble getting a vendors attention now.
- makomk 12y ago
  Yeah, which is a shame because I think an Allwinner SoC or similar would also fix the other problems people are complaining about in the discussion, like the slow/unreliable USB and Ethernet and the lack of line-in. (Allwinner SoCs have proper USB and Ethernet controllers and audio DAC/ADCs onboard.)
  - joelhaasnoot 12y ago
    Some of the Android "HDMI stick" devices I've seen running Allwinner SoCs aren't very fast either. Granted they're faster, but compared to SoCs in cell phones, they're dog slow. The Android builds also always seem to not work in one way or other.
    - ethbro 12y ago
      Compared to SoCs in $50 cell phones? Remember to keep things in perspective. ;)
- wolfgke 12y ago
  On the other hand: The VideoCore IV GPU used in the Raspberry Pi is the only recent embedded GPU for which (large parts of) the specification are publicly available.
hoggle 12y ago
I personally feel like this is the core "feature" of the raspberry pi - the fixed "constraints" of its specs. Constraints are good. Fortunately there are many inexpensive alternatives to the raspberry pi (probably thanks to it) if you really do need more CPU power.

Oh man, I was really hoping for a better CPU. The current one is just so dang slow.

by Nux 12y ago

Oh man, I was really hoping for a better CPU. The current one is just so dang slow.

"This isn’t a “Raspberry Pi 2″, but rather the final evolution of the original Raspberry Pi. "[1] I think we can interpret this as RPI 2 will be released soon with a new processor. 1 - http://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/#introducing-raspberry-pi-model-b-plus http://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/#introducing-raspberry-pi-mo...

ianwootten 12y ago
Nope, he's stated publicly that any major overhaul isn't likely to see the light of day until 2017. Listen to an interview here: http://www.raspi.today/podcast-episode-6/ http://www.raspi.today/podcast-episode-6/

paulrov 12y ago

They said they would rather people optimise for the current hardware than cause rifts between users. The CPU really isn't that bad if you don't run that behemoth X11 on it.

userbinator 12y ago

Slow and proprietary, which is not a great combination... there's a lot of interesting new ARM SoCs from China that are coming out, like the Allwinner A3x series (quad A7s, >1GHz). It would be pretty unlikely for one of those to show up in the next Pi though; if anything, it'll probably be another Broadcom.

goldenkey 12y ago
Ebon Upton [0], one of the main folk from the Raspberry Pi foundation works for Broadcom and does SoC. So odds are slim considering that connection probably enabled them to get extreme price arrangements otherwise not doable. [0] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi_Foundation http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi_Foundation
- WatchDog 12y ago
  His Broadcom relationship is probably much less relevant now that the foundation has some money in the bank and a product that has achieved wide spread success.
  - fnordfnordfnord 12y ago
    Exactly, there shouldn't be any trouble getting a vendors attention now.
makomk 12y ago
Yeah, which is a shame because I think an Allwinner SoC or similar would also fix the other problems people are complaining about in the discussion, like the slow/unreliable USB and Ethernet and the lack of line-in. (Allwinner SoCs have proper USB and Ethernet controllers and audio DAC/ADCs onboard.)
- joelhaasnoot 12y ago
  Some of the Android "HDMI stick" devices I've seen running Allwinner SoCs aren't very fast either. Granted they're faster, but compared to SoCs in cell phones, they're dog slow. The Android builds also always seem to not work in one way or other.
  - ethbro 12y ago
    Compared to SoCs in $50 cell phones? Remember to keep things in perspective. ;)
wolfgke 12y ago
On the other hand: The VideoCore IV GPU used in the Raspberry Pi is the only recent embedded GPU for which (large parts of) the specification are publicly available.

hoggle 12y ago

I personally feel like this is the core "feature" of the raspberry pi - the fixed "constraints" of its specs. Constraints are good. Fortunately there are many inexpensive alternatives to the raspberry pi (probably thanks to it) if you really do need more CPU power.