3 ms·
Of course, this assumes the case that also other weapons hadn't been developed as well. One of my favorite weapons, where my username is derived, was actually
by batbomb 12y ago
Of course, this assumes the case that also other weapons hadn't been developed as well.
One of my favorite weapons, where my username is derived, was actually very effective in it's own right.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb
Of course, a bat bomb wasn't a sure thing, but Fat man was much more complex than little boy, which wasn't as efficient, and we didn't have much more nuclear material than a few bombs worth at the time.
So, in hindsight, I don't think it's easy to say whether or not the atom bomb was absolutely necessary to ultimately prevent many lives (on both sides) from being lost. I do believe it was very effective to that end, however, with the side effect of letting the nuclear genie out of the bottle.
- walshemj 12y agoActually 1 the production line for nukes was gearing up at this point in time and 2 traditional firestorm raid killed more people than Hiroshima
- Scramblejams 12y agoThat weapon is so weird. So incredibly weird. Just what you'd expect from a Pennsylvania dentist-cum-weapons researcher, I guess? Thanks for pointing it out!