3 ms·

SES is really the only AWS service that has not been done by anyone else as far as I know. Some of the SES features (spam reporting for instance) requires coope

by dm2 12y ago

SES is really the only AWS service that has not been done by anyone else as far as I know. Some of the SES features (spam reporting for instance) requires cooperation between email service providers and Amazon, something that many other companies would have difficulty arranging.

rgbrenner 12y ago
SES is really the only AWS service that has not been done by anyone else as far as I know. sendgrid is like 5 years old: http://sendgrid.com/ http://sendgrid.com/ mailchimp's version: http://mandrill.com/ http://mandrill.com/ rackspace: http://www.mailgun.com/ http://www.mailgun.com/ also: https://postmarkapp.com/ https://postmarkapp.com/
- dm2 12y ago
  I had never explored Mandrill, thanks. SES is still the cheapest (especially when scaling up) and extremely fast from my experience with it. Here is a good article I found about SES and competitors such as Mandrill: http://www.ventureharbour.com/transactional-email-service-best-mandrill-vs-sendgrid-vs-mailjet/ http://www.ventureharbour.com/transactional-email-service-be...
  - wavefunction 12y ago
    The difference betwen SES and Mandrill? With Mandrill you'll be patronizing a great company with some fantastic folks. (First used MailChimp in 2003 and they've always been the bomb.)
    - dm2 12y ago
      Before 2012 (when they launched Mandrill) MailChimp used Amazon SES. http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f7b9ee22124ff6454424dc10c&id=05ee013c3a&e=22702a865e http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f7b9ee22124ff6454424dc10... The Mandrill service is nice, I agree. Also, MailChimp has a very cool 404 page: http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/transactional-reports-overview/ http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/transactional-reports-overvi...
cookiecaper 12y ago
Yeah, the issue isn't really that there are no similar services available, it's just that people don't really use those services very much. There are several search engines competing against Google too, but if Google blackballs your site and you're dependent on organic search traffic, you're still going to lose 90% of your visitors overnight. Internet infrastructure is pretty important, so it's a little more disconcerting to me if some huge percentage of sites are dependent on the same single ISP/datacenter/etc.

by dm2 12y ago

rgbrenner 12y ago

SES is really the only AWS service that has not been done by anyone else as far as I know. sendgrid is like 5 years old: http://sendgrid.com/ http://sendgrid.com/ mailchimp's version: http://mandrill.com/ http://mandrill.com/ rackspace: http://www.mailgun.com/ http://www.mailgun.com/ also: https://postmarkapp.com/ https://postmarkapp.com/

dm2 12y ago
I had never explored Mandrill, thanks. SES is still the cheapest (especially when scaling up) and extremely fast from my experience with it. Here is a good article I found about SES and competitors such as Mandrill: http://www.ventureharbour.com/transactional-email-service-best-mandrill-vs-sendgrid-vs-mailjet/ http://www.ventureharbour.com/transactional-email-service-be...
- wavefunction 12y ago
  The difference betwen SES and Mandrill? With Mandrill you'll be patronizing a great company with some fantastic folks. (First used MailChimp in 2003 and they've always been the bomb.)
  - dm2 12y ago
    Before 2012 (when they launched Mandrill) MailChimp used Amazon SES. http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f7b9ee22124ff6454424dc10c&id=05ee013c3a&e=22702a865e http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f7b9ee22124ff6454424dc10... The Mandrill service is nice, I agree. Also, MailChimp has a very cool 404 page: http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/transactional-reports-overview/ http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/transactional-reports-overvi...

cookiecaper 12y ago

Yeah, the issue isn't really that there are no similar services available, it's just that people don't really use those services very much. There are several search engines competing against Google too, but if Google blackballs your site and you're dependent on organic search traffic, you're still going to lose 90% of your visitors overnight. Internet infrastructure is pretty important, so it's a little more disconcerting to me if some huge percentage of sites are dependent on the same single ISP/datacenter/etc.