3 ms·

Then they are the target, and will incur many costs. Fine once, maybe, but what about the tenth time? The hundredth? The thousandth? It's like wanting Google t

Then they are the target, and will incur many costs. Fine once, maybe, but what about the tenth time? The hundredth? The thousandth? It's like wanting Google to be the legal shield for everyone committing copyright infringement on their sites. It's not remotely economically feasible.

maddev 12y ago
> It's like wanting Google to be the legal shield for everyone committing copyright infringement on their sites. It's not remotely economically feasible. Watching a little bit of youtube in say e.g. Germany might change your mind. Right now the opposite is the case, Google is acting as an illegal minion who censors arbitrary videos by order of anyone who has some cash.