3 ms·
This American Life featured interviews with Tomoaki Hamatsu (the "contestant") and his producer recently: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episod
by brownbat 12y ago
This American Life featured interviews with Tomoaki Hamatsu (the "contestant") and his producer recently:
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/529/transcript http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/529/t...
Their interviews provide additional details. Apparently the producers did feed him during the first two weeks, but only bread and water. Hamatsu did eventually have to eat dogfood. He was really forced to live naked, to the point where after the ordeal, clothes were itchy and uncomfortable, required a lot of readjusting. He was bullied into continuing when he wanted to quit.
EDIT: If Milgrim or Zimbardo were getting started today, they wouldn't be able to do any of their early work at Universities, because of ethics panels that set strict guidelines covering human subject research. They couldn't do any of it on reality TV either, because there it would be far too tame.
- pavel_lishin 12y agoWhat are the ethics of doing research on reality TV? A researcher meets a television producer at a bar, and jokingly suggests an experiment he'd like to run. The producer pitches it as a reality TV show, and it runs. Would it be ethical to use the recorded video to write the paper the researcher originally wanted to?
- imgabe 12y agoIf it's unethical to do it as an experiment, it would be unethical to do it as a reality TV show. Experiments are unethical when they're cruel and abusive. It's not like it's ok to be cruel and abusive as long as you're filming it for entertainment.
- StavrosK 12y agoI think the GP asks "is it ethical to analyze after it has already happened?" I'd say "probably".