3 ms·
> They're gaining access to high-cost cities like New York or San Francisco that offer so much more than good jobs: more restaurants, better schools, less crime
by 7Figures2Commas 12y ago
> They're gaining access to high-cost cities like New York or San Francisco that offer so much more than good jobs: more restaurants, better schools, less crime, even cleaner air.
Yes, and a lot of these folks are spending the vast majority of their disposable income on housing and discretionary income on the so-called "amenities" mentioned in the article.
Don't get me wrong: it's great to be able to live in a desirable area with high employment, but at the end of the day, it's not what you make, it's what you keep. There are a lot of folks like this guy[1] who confuse cashflow from employment with financial security.
The paltry savings rates in this country aren't just a product of the less educated, lower-wage workers. If you look at national averages, it's pretty obvious that most college graduates aren't doing a great job of converting their higher wages into savings and assets.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5505622 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5505622
- autokad 12y agoi dont think that is fair. just because they are not taking advantage of their improved situation doesnt mean they dont have a situational advantage. What im trying to say is, they do have a huge net benefit, but they may not be financially behaved to actually save it. My former roomate quite a bit of money and spent a great deal of it on alcohol. you could increase his wage, he'd just find a way to spend more. you could decrease his wage, and his spending on those non-accounted things would drop.
- Chronic28 12y agoIt is foolish to look solely at savings rates. What about all the intangibles the rich, college grads implicitly pay to build their network and make them smarter?