3 ms·
It's worth reading the Xerox story: http://www.gatesnotes.com/media/features/books/Bill_Gates_John_Brooks_Business_Adventures_Xerox_Free_Chapter.pdf http://www.
by paul 12y ago
It's worth reading the Xerox story: http://www.gatesnotes.com/media/features/books/Bill_Gates_John_Brooks_Business_Adventures_Xerox_Free_Chapter.pdf http://www.gatesnotes.com/media/features/books/Bill_Gates_Jo...
Xerox was essentially the hot startup of the 1960's, and it's interesting how similar many of the issues and attitudes were back then, including fears that copying would destroy the publishing industry, struggles with no longer being a startup, and resentment from older industries.
In the opinion of some commentators, what has happened so far is
only the first phase of a kind of revolution in graphics. “Xerography
is bringing a reign of terror into the world of publishing, because it
means that every reader can become both author and publisher,” the
Canadian sage Marshall McLuhan wrote in the spring, 1966, issue of
the American Scholar. “Authorship and readership alike can become
production-oriented under xerography.… Xerography is electricity invading the world of typography, and it means a total revolution in
this old sphere.”
...
Dr. Dessauer threw a retrospectively distracted glance at the ceiling
and went on, “Hardly anybody was very optimistic in the early years.
Various members of our own group would come in and tell me that
the damn thing would never work. The biggest risk was that electrostatics would prove to be not feasible in high humidity. Almost all
the experts assumed that — they’d say, ‘You’ll never make copies in
New Orleans.’ And even if it did work, the marketing people thought
we were dealing with a potential market of no more than a few thousand machines. Some advisers told us that we were absolutely crazy
to go ahead with the project. Well, as you know, everything worked
out all right — the 914 worked, even in New Orleans, and there was
a big market for it. Then came the desk-top version, the 813. I stuck
my neck way out again on that, holding out for a design that some experts considered too fragile.”
...
McColough said that since he came to Haloid, in 1954, he felt he’d
been part of three entirely different companies — until 1959 a small
one engaged in a dangerous and exciting gamble; from 1959 to 1964
a growing one enjoying the fruits of victory; and now a huge one
branching out in new directions. I asked him which one he liked best,
and he thought a long time. “I don’t know,” he said finally. “I used to
feel greater freedom, and I used to feel that everyone in the company
shared attitudes on specific matters like labor relations. I don’t feel
that way so much now. The pressures are greater, and the company is
more impersonal. I wouldn’t say that life has become easier, or that it
is likely to get easier in the future.”
- larrys 12y ago"Xerography is bringing a reign of terror into the world of publishing, because it means that every reader can become both author and publisher,”" One of major issues with publishing was distribution. Merely having the tools (back then) to create printed content was not the same as being able to put it in the hands of people that would want to read the content. Without the distribution (or the money to advertise) it didn't matter that you could run off copies or even if you owned your own printing press and bookbinding operation. You still had to get the product in the hands of the public.
- dennisgorelik 12y ago> One of major issues with publishing was distribution. Distribution is still a major issue. Cost of making a copy is ~$0 now, but it's still hard to distribute your information.
- larrys 12y ago"but it's still hard to distribute your information." In a sense because of the increased competition (and increased content available) it's even harder. Otoh, in theory the hard work has shifted and it is possible to get your info distributed in a "diy" fashion. For example you could write a blog, get a following, and sell a book. I'm sure if PG came out with a book there would be a market for it. Back in the day a PG would have to convince a publisher that there was a market for what he wanted to write. So it's really a shifting of the work needed to get distributed.
- dennisgorelik 12y ago> it's really a shifting of the work needed to get distributed The hardest part of distribution seems to be advanced filtering of content and matching it with interested/relevant readers. Whoever is doing that filtering/matching the best - is best suited for distribution. Is that filtering/matching work best done by the publisher or the writer? The writer should know her audience the best. Who is in the better position to make such match: publisher or original writer?