3 ms·
Looks hopefully like a great rewrite. FCK = Definitely a major player in the wysiwyg scene for long years. I have fingers x-ed on this being the step that resol
by dpnewman 17y ago
Looks hopefully like a great rewrite. FCK = Definitely a major player in the wysiwyg scene for long years. I have fingers x-ed on this being the step that resolves the search. Finding a wysiwig that is not bloated and overly complex, bug-free and has the essentials, has occupied me for years. The one thing CK clearly swung and missed in their demo though is the seeming thrill they express about being "colorful". The defaults for modal dialog buttons: bright orange, yellow and green!! CKEditor, you could not have done anything more to suggest you were somehow ignoring or out of touch with the evolution of web UI than this. Now I know that this is all css customizable. Great. I look forward to altering those. But really, if you can show us a web site with good design that uses flaring colors in a text editor UI, I will be stunned. Anyway, sorry for the rant... thrilled that you have moved this forward and can't wait to try. I hope though that you quickly iterate the defaults and the demo on the site to be in line with the notion that UI widgets should not scream for attention, but emphasize the clean and functional.
- brandonkelly 17y agoHaha, definitely agree with this. I took some time to override much of the Kama skin's CSS (including the dialogs) for Wygwam. Ended up with something much more clean: http://brandon-kelly.com/fieldframe/showcase http://brandon-kelly.com/fieldframe/showcase