3 ms·
I think by "single division of labor" he means that there's one global labor supply which gets stratisfied across countries, "trans-national" labor supply. So s
by kylebrown 12y ago
I think by "single division of labor" he means that there's one global labor supply which gets stratisfied across countries, "trans-national" labor supply. So some countries have most of their workers performing so-called "high-skill" capital-intensive production (first-world "core" countries, eg Hershey's imports cocoa, then processes it in the US to produce chocolate). Other countries develop a more blue-collar labor-intensive job supply, for the extraction of raw materials (cocao farmers in the Ivory Coast producing raw exports).
"Multiple divisions of labor" would mean that each nation maintains its own, sovereign hierarchy of labor. It describes economies prior to globalization, when nation-states tended to do most of their trade internally, rather than across huge geographic distances and political lines.
- saraid216 12y agoHm, I think I understand the essential concept, but your point about trade seems misplaced. International trade doesn't require a globalized er... hierarchy of labor; it just requires comparative advantage of some sort. I suppose a unified "division of labor" (these terms are not being used the way I am used to their being used) would certainly intensify the volume of international trade, but I do not think it is required by any means.