3 ms·
Sorry, you are right, I missed that. Arguably your solution is still different because you sort the input instead of the output, but that's unlikely to matter
by moe 12y ago
Sorry, you are right, I missed that.
Arguably your solution is still different because you sort the input instead of the output, but that's unlikely to matter here.
- eridius 12y agoThe only difference is I sort before uniquing, but the python code uniques before sorting. But the result is identical (and in shell scripting, you can't unique without sorting first). Although FWIW I just checked and the `sort` tool actually has a flag for uniquing during the sort. I don't know if that's portable though.
- moe 12y agoYes. Pedantically speaking his solution may be faster for the pathological case of the input consisting almost entirely of duplicates.