>I think their argument about the technology is batty though. It's the same argument that gets made every time a new creative medium is created. I'm not too of

>I think their argument about the technology is batty though. It's the same argument that gets made every time a new creative medium is created. I'm not too off put by that argument, as there are plenty of technologies that have high hopes, but have always been 20 years away because it frankly the experience just sucks, or the problem is harder than anyone actually understands. Such as, 3D Pictures/TV, Paper-thin displays, Graphene Transistors. Sure I'd love to eat my hat on most of these, but as some of these technologies are, they still just suck or don't provide a good enough experience to upgrade over the less-tech experience.