I don't get all of the outrage. Owner uses Ellis Act to declare he is getting out of multi-tenant rental business. Plans to sell and/or renovate. Tenants, who

I don't get all of the outrage. Owner uses Ellis Act to declare he is getting out of multi-tenant rental business. Plans to sell and/or renovate. Tenants, who don't own the building, are no longer able to rent said apartments and notified of eviction. Why is the owner a bad guy? Because SF rental and real-estate markets are out of control? How is that the owners fault and why should they have to keep renting property when they no longer want to do so? If the tenants are so shocked they are no longer allowed to rent an apartment, why didn't they buy a place? Too expensive? Move someplace else. I would love to live in SF but I cannot afford the cost of living difference so I don't. I pay 1/4 what my colleagues in SF pay in rent and I'm BUYING a home.