3 ms·
That's true. If this is an issue you could avoid using a signaling server altogether, and instead exchange offer/answer via e.g. GPG-encrypted email. I wonder
by cjbprime 12y ago
That's true. If this is an issue you could avoid using a signaling server altogether, and instead exchange offer/answer via e.g. GPG-encrypted email.
I wonder if there are any designs for a signaling server/system that doesn't have this loss of privacy of connection information, or if you just very quickly end up reimplementing Tor when you try..
- obvio171 12y agoGood point. If any sufficiently complicated NAT traversal solution ends up containing an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of the hidden services protocol, might as well put our efforts into building out Tor itself and get the privacy for "free".