5 ms·
for one thing, you are forgetting that people are human. this is what that workflow would more realisticly look like: cd /yor/src/dir bash: cd: /yor/sr
by TheSoftwareGuy 12y ago
for one thing, you are forgetting that people are human. this is what that workflow would more realisticly look like:
cd /yor/src/dir
bash: cd: /yor/src/dir: No such file or directory
examines closely to look for typo
cd /your/src/dir
<edit stuff>
git diff
git comit -m "edited stuff"
Did you mean this? git: 'comit' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
Did you mean this?
commit
git commit -m "edited stuff"
I think this is enough to get the picture.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- rahij 12y ago> cd /yor/src/dir > bash: cd: /yor/src/dir: No such file or directory <tab> ? And on anecdotal evidence, I've observed that people who use git intensively everyday often have aliases to these commands that have a low probability of typos. eg gcom => git commit