3 ms·
You could always some form of SRP[0]. It shouldn't be too much overhead to do only when your session times out. At the very least you're 1) not sharing secret
by jimktrains2 12y ago
You could always some form of SRP[0]. It shouldn't be too much overhead to do only when your session times out. At the very least you're 1) not sharing secrets 2) limits reply attacks to a finite amount of time.
The other method might be, as a sibling said, HMAC the message with a shared private key. If you can specify that clocks should be pretty close, your reply attack window becomes small.
[0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Remote_Password_protocol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Remote_Password_protocol