3 ms·
It's the ubiquity of the interpreter (every browser), right? You'd be hard-pressed to write anything for the web without JS, and once you're writing in that lan
by roasm 12y ago
It's the ubiquity of the interpreter (every browser), right? You'd be hard-pressed to write anything for the web without JS, and once you're writing in that language, there's a strong pull to use similar libraries/processes/etc. for non-in-browser work.
- x1798DE 12y agoIt's not at all hard to write things for the web without JS, it's just if you need an application to be client-side for whatever reason, JS is necessary. I would guess that most sites over-use Javascript (or, at least, are overly reliant upon it).