4 ms·

I agree, this might cut into more of box.net's offering than dropbox though.

• rufugee 12y ago
  Afaik, it's not competitively priced for large volume. We priced around 650 users for box, and it came out to be roughly $8K annually. At $5/month/user, the Amazon offering would be roughly $40K annually. I'd actually prefer to go the Amazon route, but they're going to have to offer volume discounts to make it compelling.
  • MichaelApproved 12y ago
    If you have 650 users (who I'm assuming are paid employees), doesn't the cost become marginal in comparison to improved productivity? I would guess the time to re-train all 650 on a new platform and the ease of transferring existing files would be more meaningful than the price difference.
  • ranvir 12y ago
    $8k annually for 650 users is about $1 per month per user vs a $15 list price. Is that right?
    • rufugee 12y ago
      I'm actually waiting for clarification on this...I think my team might've misinterpreted the quote, and if so, Amazon would be significantly cheaper. I'll update as soon as I know (most likely Monday).