> I rarely see any well thought out, cohesive arguments for re-structuring wikipedia. Yes, there are a few (such as the examples to improve citizendium). The f

> I rarely see any well thought out, cohesive arguments for re-structuring wikipedia. Yes, there are a few (such as the examples to improve citizendium). The first would be to remove anonymity. If the editors are know it would improve quality and would help to bring in specialists from fields. Currently WP is now a vehicle for anonymous slander. Lies simply get repeated. Things do not have to be true – it just have to be on another website.