This is the kind of content we want on the front page of HN? A "review" that is nothing more than content copied out of the book with a few paragraphs introduci

This is the kind of content we want on the front page of HN? A "review" that is nothing more than content copied out of the book with a few paragraphs introducing each copied section, for a book that has been out for almost a year and a half? If you want to read some real reviews of Bad Pharma a quick search will find you these: http://davidhealy.org/not-so-bad-pharma/ http://davidhealy.org/not-so-bad-pharma/ http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/oct/17/bad-pharma-ben-goldacre-review http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/oct/17/bad-pharma-ben-... http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/bad-pharma-a-manifesto-to-fix-the-pharmaceutical-industry/ http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/bad-pharma-a-manifesto-t... Goldacre's blog, Bad Science, also talks a lot about the book and the topic: http://www.badscience.net/category/big-pharma/ http://www.badscience.net/category/big-pharma/