3 ms·

Try reading his blog then. He's not rebutting it word for word, of course, but he makes it fairly obvious there are some rather large and often fundamental hol

• PM_Tech 12y ago
  No I am good thanks. I will just discount it. I don't consider a blog post a suitable way to analyse the magnum opus of an economist of the stature of Piketty. EDIT : Curiousity got the better of me. I read the review of Capital. I stopped at this line - "Here are some ideas, some taken from my 2009 economic recovery plan for the U.S." The author is a supremely talented electrical engineer. Stick to that instead of whining "No one listened to my economics ideas." Last time I checked, economists don't post blogs claiming no one is listening to their ideas about microprocessors or front end development.
  • Tyrannosaurs 12y ago
    As an analysis it's a little all over the place. The first half says "this is why Piketty is (probably) wrong about there being a problem" and the second half saying "and he's wrong about what we should do about it, here's what we should do instead". Surely if there is no problem, the there is nothing which needs to be done about it?