5 ms·
Not bad for startups? So the merit of this is based on the value to startups, not society? Another way to interpret what you said is: Google and other large co
by Multics 12y ago
Not bad for startups? So the merit of this is based on the value to startups, not society?
Another way to interpret what you said is: Google and other large companies can't apply large quantities of resources to health.
- netcan 12y agoWhat is this? This is a forum for/about startups. He made a statement relevant to startups. What exactly are you mad at?
- Multics 12y agoWhat is this? Or, what is 'this'? The answer being. 1) Quite an abstract question 2) A pronoun It's relevant. It's the conclusion that's concerning! Again. 'Another way to interpret what you said is: Google and other large companies can't apply large quantities of resources to health.'
- netcan 12y ago- deleted - I apologize about this thread.
- Multics 12y ago> Maybe: 'One way of misrepresenting what you said..' Then. > Allow me to put words in your mouth... I don't want you people talking about other ideas related to this article. Consistency? > I (Multics) would like to talk about how regulating industries like medicine prevents Google and others from investing in them and potentially benefiting society. I think you understand my position. Except, what I said was framed in the context of the parent comment. And it was an assertion, not a request.
- Multics 12y agoWhy delete a comment I mostly quoted? Seems like an attempt at gamesmanship. Well, c'est la vie!