3 ms·
The trick is to come up with a probabilistic model for how they could have implemented this simulation that we're in, assuming that we are simulated. Is there
by jaekwon 17y ago
The trick is to come up with a probabilistic model for how they could have implemented this simulation that we're in, assuming that we are simulated.
Is there a way to exploit the simulation?
If I were to create a simulated universe, the program would have assertions that test for an interesting condition. (Say, if the simulated humans can achieve X, then break, and print a stack trace so we can study what lead to X)
When the universe simulator breaks, does that cause a perceivable difference for us, the simulated? Not necessarily. We would never experience such a break because by definition there is nothing to experience.
We can exploit the program if it is likely that the simulation program includes glitches. There are likely to be glitches if certain computations are innately difficult to do (e.g. NP hard?) so our simulation architects had to "hack" an estimation. For example, the strangeness of quantum mechanics may be just a poor (albiet optimized) implementation of newtonian mechanics.
- gojomo 17y agoRobin Hanson's suggestions for what behavior would best exploit living in a simulation are worthy of a debate all in themselves: http://www.jetpress.org/volume7/simulation.htm http://www.jetpress.org/volume7/simulation.htm Abstract: If you might be living in a simulation then all else equal you should care less about others, live more for today, make your world look more likely to become rich, expect to and try more to participate in pivotal events, be more entertaining and praiseworthy, and keep the famous people around you happier and more interested in you.