3 ms·

> Dropping out vowels isn't saving you anything. Except the consistency thing I was talking about. In one of previous job at a fortune 100 company had to have

> Dropping out vowels isn't saving you anything. Except the consistency thing I was talking about. In one of previous job at a fortune 100 company had to have a consistent naming scheme for everything in the DC for whatever reason that predated me. 3 letter production environment, followed by a 4 digit number which described all kinds of things about what apps / environments ran on the host. Also having fixed with fields for hosts is very valuable when you are writing scripts to parse data on hostnames, especially when you are scaling up to tens / hundreds of thousands of hosts you begin to appreciate consistency.

gnaritas 12y ago
I think the question is about what is good, not what do you do when you're stuck working with a bad standards, and those are bad standards. Relying on fixed length host names is as bad as relying on fixed length data or fixed length file names, i.e. it's absurdly bad practice. These are things developers learned sucked long ago. Fixed width is not valuable, it's brittle.
- res0nat0r 12y ago
  I wouldn't use fixed values myself, but when I've worked at places with 100k+ hosts using naming schemes with consistent abbreviations of the same lengths, with other fields describing consistent data is much better than fun names when you need to fix things quickly. Different story for small networks, have fun all you want. With hundreds of thousands of hosts scattered all over the world, this isn't used.
  - gnaritas 12y ago
    I haven't said a word about fun names, I think you rather missed my point entirely.
    - res0nat0r 12y ago
      I get it, you like full hostnames such as production-mail-server-and-occasional-nas-file-server. I'm just pointing out the fact that billion dollar real world orgs use abbreviated hostnames more often than not, and they have good reasons to do so.
      - gnaritas 12y ago
        If you got it, you wouldn't be putting up a straw man of long server names like "production-mail-server-and-occasional-nas-file-server" so no, you really don't get it because you aren't listening. You can have short server names that are easy to type AND still use actual words. Typing prd instead of prod is not saving you anything worth saving nor making server names easier to type or remember no matter how many there are. While production-mail-server-and-occasional-nas-file-server is an absurd name, it was your example so I assume part of the scheme in this big network, but you'd just have well crammed all the same info into... prod-mail-file Without abbreviations and without losing the meaning. > and they have good reasons to do so. Yea, inertia.
        res0nat0r 12y ago
        The real world companies I've worked for in the past have good reason to use abbreviated host names, sorry this is so offensive, but that's...real life?

gnaritas 12y ago

I think the question is about what is good, not what do you do when you're stuck working with a bad standards, and those are bad standards. Relying on fixed length host names is as bad as relying on fixed length data or fixed length file names, i.e. it's absurdly bad practice. These are things developers learned sucked long ago. Fixed width is not valuable, it's brittle.

res0nat0r 12y ago
I wouldn't use fixed values myself, but when I've worked at places with 100k+ hosts using naming schemes with consistent abbreviations of the same lengths, with other fields describing consistent data is much better than fun names when you need to fix things quickly. Different story for small networks, have fun all you want. With hundreds of thousands of hosts scattered all over the world, this isn't used.
- gnaritas 12y ago
  I haven't said a word about fun names, I think you rather missed my point entirely.
  - res0nat0r 12y ago
    I get it, you like full hostnames such as production-mail-server-and-occasional-nas-file-server. I'm just pointing out the fact that billion dollar real world orgs use abbreviated hostnames more often than not, and they have good reasons to do so.
    - gnaritas 12y ago
      If you got it, you wouldn't be putting up a straw man of long server names like "production-mail-server-and-occasional-nas-file-server" so no, you really don't get it because you aren't listening. You can have short server names that are easy to type AND still use actual words. Typing prd instead of prod is not saving you anything worth saving nor making server names easier to type or remember no matter how many there are. While production-mail-server-and-occasional-nas-file-server is an absurd name, it was your example so I assume part of the scheme in this big network, but you'd just have well crammed all the same info into... prod-mail-file Without abbreviations and without losing the meaning. > and they have good reasons to do so. Yea, inertia.
      - res0nat0r 12y ago
        The real world companies I've worked for in the past have good reason to use abbreviated host names, sorry this is so offensive, but that's...real life?