3 ms·
There are always two sides of the medal. I remember reading article more than 10 years ago about fantasy writer. This guy wrote some story for one of the larges
by funkyy 12y ago
There are always two sides of the medal.
I remember reading article more than 10 years ago about fantasy writer. This guy wrote some story for one of the largest fantasy publishers and he got $2K for it. Deal was made, all good.
It was that until 6 months later when his story turn out to be a hit and the company published it again (they were holding the rights to it).
So this publisher came to those fantasy circles hating on the company why they never sent him a cheque since they made probably millions from it. Even if he said himself they had all the rights to it and he agreed on contract as it was - he still was mad that he didnt got more. Instead of building business relationship, trying to release more stories for better fee he chose to hate on them.
Me myself as indie game developer I wouldn't sign contract that I am not feeling comfortable about.
I am selling all rights to my games to publishers, so I can focus on game development only. If one of the games will become next Angry Birds - oh well, I wont be hating on the company, but I would try to come out with joint deal for sequels.
I understand there could be mistake in accounting, but regarding some comments - publishers are not charity company. They are profit oriented. So if you have in your contract "you get paid $50K for exclusive rights" then you get paid $50K and nothing else.
- hyperliner 12y agoI agree with your point that people seem to always want more than the deal the agreed to. However, it appears this was blatant theft.
- opendais 12y agohttps://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100708/02510310122/hollywood-accounting-losing-courts.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100708/02510310122/holly... Stuff like this happens regularly when you have a "publisher". So, it really depends how things are structured. Many times royalties are reduced through arbitrary expenditures which is why its a problem.
- jjoonathan 12y ago> Deal was made, all good. Suppose I'm a serial killer and I kidnap you. I say "I'm going to be nice today -- I'll let you choose between dying by pistol and dying by machete. If you don't choose I'll think of something worse." You choose pistol. Am I absolved of the murder because I gave you a choice? Of course not. Choice does not imply lack of coercion. It is perfectly reasonable to be upset that X forced you to choose bad option Y (e.g. where X is market forces and Y is the combination of a shit salary and no equity).