3 ms·
Hi, lifeiststillgood. Yes I am Anne and I don't mind grumpy people so much. We all have our days! :-) If quantum entanglement is used - in the way we understan
by MrQuincle 12y ago
Hi, lifeiststillgood. Yes I am Anne and I don't mind grumpy people so much. We all have our days! :-)
If quantum entanglement is used - in the way we understand now - a subluminal/luminal carrier is required. Sending these signals is power intensive, so it is likely to be the case that modulating an existing source might be cheaper. Not so much a parameter that helps us much further though.
Of course, it is important to take sparsity into account. It is very unlikely that a fixed signal originating from one point in the sky is the most efficient manner of communication. Sparsity is becoming quite an important concept in machine learning and I think SETI research might benefit from it. But, I've to say, I don't have experience with advances made in SETI research, so maybe they have advanced beyond the standard machine learning methods. :-) I'm just an ordinary roboticist.
- MrQuincle 12y agoI found some articles in this direction: - http://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.3966 http://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.3966, Searching for Cost-Optimized Interstellar Beacons and Messaging with Cost-Optimized Interstellar Beacons, by James Benford (short pulses rather than a continuous signal). - http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4w59f2wk.pdf http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4w59f2wk.pdf, Design of interstellar digital communication links: Some insights from communication engineering, by David Messerschmitt (optimization as a coordination tool with aliens).