3 ms·
> it's hard to get good quality research to see whether substitution is better than abstinence. How about maintenance? There's ample evidence from the UK, Swi
by chimeracoder 12y ago
> it's hard to get good quality research to see whether substitution is better than abstinence.
How about maintenance? There's ample evidence from the UK, Switzerland, and elsewhere showing that diacetylmorphine maintenance (treating heroin addiction with heroin) is incredibly effective[0][1].
The effectiveness of treating existing users is the primary concern, but a nice bonus is that it also seems to have served as a deterrent for new heroin users due to its social image as a medical problem, rather than a criminalized behavior[2].
(Remember that, when administered in a controlled setting and in predetermined quantities (and purity), heroin use carries few of the dangers commonly associated with its use on the street, and is fairly similar to the related drugs that you already receive in the hospital[3])
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heroin_maintenance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heroin_maintenance
[1] http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0810635 http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0810635
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heroin_maintenance#cite_note-9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heroin_maintenance#cite_note-9
[3] Such as morphine (the similarity of the names "morphine" and "diacetylmorphine" is not a coincidence!)
- DanBC 12y agoI really wish that there was political will and bravery to allow maintainence with heroin and clinical injecting rooms. That's obviously better for users, but it's better for wider society too. People who are addicted to drugs will take drugs, so forcing them to do so hidden away in places without safe needle disposal means members of the public or cleaning staff risk needle stick injury.