3 ms·
Rather than redistribution, why not have a basic universal income for all?
by yarou 12y ago
Rather than redistribution, why not have a basic universal income for all?
- dragonwriter 12y agoBasic universal income for all is redistribution -- assuming that it is supported by a tax system that doesn't make it completely pointless instead. E.g., if you do it in a system where the only tax is a straight no-exceptions, no-variations capitation and the taxed population and the recieving population are the same, then its not redistribution, but its not actually doing anything but altering the effective amount of the capitation, either.