4 ms·
Really wish they broke "86% accuracy" into precision and recall.
by glaugh 12y ago
Really wish they broke "86% accuracy" into precision and recall.
- icegreentea 12y agoHere's the paper: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1552526014024546 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1552526014... Re your comment: "accuracy 87%, sensitivity 85%, and specificity 88%"
- skierscott 12y agoWhat does that mean for false positive and true negative?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- icegreentea 12y agoSensitivity is the true positive rate, specificity is the true negative rate. From the body of the paper, for their chosen test, their False Positive Rate appears to be 21.2% (100% - 68.8%) and their False Negative Rate appears to be 5.1% (100% - 94.9%). For this type of test, its the false negative rate that we'll really worry about.
- taralx 12y agoWow, that's odd. Why does accuracy drop when MRI is included?
- glaugh 12y agoAh, much appreciated.