4 ms·
Good point. I just figured they might have preferred to run their own DDNS service, or use p2p, since as we've seen, a service as large as No-IP can be complet
by dublinben 12y ago
Good point. I just figured they might have preferred to run their own DDNS service, or use p2p, since as we've seen, a service as large as No-IP can be completely shut down in a situation like this.
- nucleardog 12y agoIt can be shutdown, but with a lot more difficulty than just getting some random server somewhere used only for the botnet pulled offline, which was probably the point, really. If I were a malware author I would never have assumed anyone could have gotten a court order to take an entire service offline.