3 ms·
The other side is not being completely blackballed, they just get less airtime. Also, some of the dissenters on this particular issue have a vested economic in
by div 12y ago
The other side is not being completely blackballed, they just get less airtime.
Also, some of the dissenters on this particular issue have a vested economic interest in their dissent, and are not really looking for truth.
- logfromblammo 12y agoEveryone has a vested economic interest in his own career. Every industry has participants who are just in it for the money. But that doesn't mean some of those people are not also passionate about research and scientific integrity. On television, truth doesn't matter. All that matters is whether you can command people's attention. Just like advertisements for prescription medication, the goal is not a direct sale. The goal is to convince the viewer to learn more from someone well educated in the field. And then get their money. My hypothesis is that opportunities to challenge establishment thought increase as new sources of funding flow into an industry. For software, more funding means more startup failures, and more disruptive tech that somehow avoided failure. For research, more new funding means less reliance on the university hierarchy or government grant proposals, and enough new publications that not even Elsevier could possibly swallow all of them.