3 ms·
It seems you're misinformed as well. http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BehaviourDrivenDevelopment http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BehaviourDrivenDevelopment Again, nothing to do
by rubiquity 12y ago
It seems you're misinformed as well.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BehaviourDrivenDevelopment http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BehaviourDrivenDevelopment
Again, nothing to do with silly syntax. It's about acceptance testing.
- parasubvert 12y agoIt seems you're not reading what I (or anyone else) wrote. I never mentioned syntax. I mentioned a DSL. Using a DSL is about much more than syntax, it is about expressing verifiable behavior tests in a ubiquitous language. I said nothing about any specific syntax of external or internal DSL, heck people contort FitNesse to fit BDD for whatever reason. I have been on Ward's wiki since 1998, this isn't exactly new. It's also not for everyone.
- rubiquity 12y agoSorry, by syntax I meant DSL. So by your logic, a language that doesn't have good ability to create DSLs can't do BDD?