4 ms·
Self-learning has its own problems, some that have caught me out on more occasions than I care to admit. I graduated with an EE degree six years ago, but over
by vitaminj 19y ago
Self-learning has its own problems, some that have caught me out on more occasions than I care to admit.
I graduated with an EE degree six years ago, but over the years found myself more and more interested in economics. I read textbooks, papers and articles, and over time I thought I knew something about it. It was only when I went back to uni this year to formally study for an economics degree that I realised I knew jack. All the fundamentals and boring little details that I used to gloss over had more signficance than I'd ever thought. I also had access to the university resources, good instruction and a fairly rigorous course structure. Granted I was motivated and keen to learn (sadly unlike the bulk of the 19 year old kids there), but I gained a much more solid basis for understanding econs than I would have had I not gone back to uni.
I'm certainly no apologist for universities and schools, but wanted to point out that there are some issues with self-learning, namely 1) focussing only on the interesting topics and neglecting the fundamentals, 2) unstructured learning can be ill-directed and 3) good instruction is more efficient than finding your own way.
- arvid 19y agoTrue, but one needs to be very self-critical when self-learning and interact with others (not necessarily in the formal situation). To me, formal education is to provide the tools and knowledge necessary to learn on one's own, outside of a formal setting. Think about it. In elementary school, 90% of learning occurs inside the classroom. In high school, maybe 60-70%. In college, maybe 20-40%. Grad school 10-20%. Ironically, what increases during this development is the need to interact with others: colleagues, mentors and acting as a mentor to others.