3 ms·
I didn't write that sentence very well if that's how it was interpreted, sorry. I meant to say that the abstractions available to Haskell are more powerful. I
by Ixiaus 12y ago
I didn't write that sentence very well if that's how it was interpreted, sorry. I meant to say that the abstractions available to Haskell are more powerful.
I can't really think of any abstraction that's not available to it - even an Object System is possible in Haskell, it just wouldn't be as easy to use as Monads are.
- eru 12y ago> I can't really think of any abstraction that's not available to it [...] Dependent typing doesn't work very well in Haskell (yet).