3 ms·
His objective function is wrong, I think: it considers only the total number of people we can accommodate with all spacings >= 2, but if that were the only thin
by gjm11 17y ago
His objective function is wrong, I think: it considers only the total number of people we can accommodate with all spacings >= 2, but if that were the only thing people cared about then we wouldn't have the "use the middle of the biggest gap" algorithm in the first place. And apparently no one ever finishes.
The model would be appropriate for the following situation: people turn up sequentially but rapidly; once someone starts peeing they stay where they are for ever; anyone who arrives and is unable to find a urinal whose neighbours are unused immediately commits suicide out of embarrassment.
- calambrac 17y agoSee also: Chinese Restaurant Process lying about an infinite number of available tables, Indian Buffet Process lying about an infinite number of available dishes, Dining Philosophers not being smart enough to go get another pair of chopsticks, etc. Mathematicians are dumb.
- madcaptenor 17y agoYeah, but his model has an exact solution. It's a nice mathematical problem even if it doesn't reflect actual urinal behavior.