The paper is from 2005, so it might be worth saying that on the submission title. And it's also worth mentioning that because Gelman and Shalizi have recently

The paper is from 2005, so it might be worth saying that on the submission title. And it's also worth mentioning that because Gelman and Shalizi have recently written a really nice paper about the philosophy of Bayes: http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/philosophy.pdf http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/phil... (PDF) Gelman is a well-known "bayesian", and Shalizi is a well-known "not all that is interesting is bayes"-ian.