3 ms·
For what truth there is to this, I wonder if it's partly a class thing too. For people middle-class and above, myself included, I get the sense that cars are so
by ufmace 12y ago
For what truth there is to this, I wonder if it's partly a class thing too. For people middle-class and above, myself included, I get the sense that cars are something that was always present in abundance, and therefore no big deal. We're more sensitive to noticing the annoying things about them, like parking, worrying about driving drunk, traffic jams, etc, and perhaps take for granted the freedom in having your own car.
People in lower classes, at least that I have interacted with, tend to see a car as more of a status symbol, since they're not so readily available at their income levels. As in, their family may have one, but they don't just automatically get their kids a car when they turn 16. And so they're more of a status symbol, and people tend to more glamorize the freedom of it while ignoring the headaches as trivial.
- jiggy2011 12y agoIn many ways cars are also more useful to people who are poor. You're more likely to work in some out of the way place without good transport links rather than an office in the big city and taking taxis can get expensive. If you look at jobs in construction "must have own transport to get to the job site" is often listed as a requirement, less so for programming jobs. Poorer people are more likely to holiday by packing their family into the car and driving somewhere rather than getting an international flight. They can also be used to transport stuff around when moving etc. In short cars provide a great deal of flexibility and utility for the cost.