4 ms·
Why is it not in a company's interest to have part-time employees? By anecdotal accounts, it seems that part-time employees are less expensive than full-timers
by delinka 12y ago
Why is it not in a company's interest to have part-time employees? By anecdotal accounts, it seems that part-time employees are less expensive than full-timers (such anecdotes generally refer to mandated benefits for full-time workers as the major cost difference.)
- mark_l_watson 12y agoGood question. Every company I worked for had to provide me with an office that was empty one day a week. In most of the companies I worked for, employees who worked a minimum of 30 hours a week got full fringe benefits :-)
- delinka 12y agoThanks. "Square-footage" is one of those things I always forget when calculating the expense of employees. (Probably one reason I'm an employee and not an employer.)