2 ms·
Well, the author recommends induction as a means of figuring this out, and it seems for induction to work we need to have some existing example to induce the pr
by InfiniteRand 12y ago
Well, the author recommends induction as a means of figuring this out, and it seems for induction to work we need to have some existing example to induce the principle from (if I am remembering my maths, I might not be). So to figure out our concept it may be worth taking a look at what the use of object-oriented features is, and use that as a starting point. Maybe, again I am a little rusty on my inductive reasoning.
I think one thing that strikes me with Object-oriented programming in general is the idea of data management and function management.
I guess if we look at the features that are associated with object-orientation (I am not pretending that I am being strictly inductive at this point, although I think this is vaguely inductive), I would say that it takes the management and organization of programming concepts, such as data and function organization, and embeds it into the language itself.
- techadv 12y agoThe article author was referring to inductive reasoning in the sense of epistemology, which is not the same as mathematical induction. In fact, mathematical induction is a deductive reasoning technique. Here's the relevant wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning
- jorgis 12y agoYou might also refer to this as "recursion" when talking about computer programming.