3 ms·
Even many of the sites currently on the list seem like "not a big deal". E.g. petty theft by private citizens, gossip, etc. The only reason some of the current
by nmrm 12y ago
Even many of the sites currently on the list seem like "not a big deal". E.g. petty theft by private citizens, gossip, etc.
The only reason some of the currently listed sites even exist is that some reporter figured they could make a few bucks of ad revenue and didn't care about other's privacy. Removing them does absolutely no harm to society; I have no problem with starving sleazy reporters out of their jobs.
edit: the law is clearly unworkable, but I'm a huge fan of its intent.