6 ms·
It was poorly expressed, but I think gnuvince was referring to the fact that it is possible to implement machine-friendly ADTs. Rust is just one example of a la
by bjz_ 12y ago
It was poorly expressed, but I think gnuvince was referring to the fact that it is possible to implement machine-friendly ADTs. Rust is just one example of a language that has them.
- tptacek 12y agoNo, that's not what 'gnuvince was trying to communicate.
- gnuvince 12y agoIn fact, that's exactly what I meant, but thanks for trying to be my shrink.
- tptacek 12y agoI'm not your shrink, but thanks to the handy "Search" feature on the site, I had read every comment you've written that mentions Golang or Rust before I wrote that. I stand by what I wrote. This probably isn't worth the debate, though.