3 ms·
I don't quite understand this. In my opinion JS "classes", if you want to call them that, look, feel and act very clunky. My opinion, of course... Please could
by zo1 12y ago
I don't quite understand this. In my opinion JS "classes", if you want to call them that, look, feel and act very clunky. My opinion, of course... Please could you explain to me how you feel Java "classes" feel clunky and look wrong? I'm genuinely curious, and open to being convinced.
Note I substituted your usage of "objects" with classes, because they're vastly different concepts. I know, murky water when it comes to JS, but still.
- k__ 12y agoMy point was, classes and inheritance feel natural in Java. Object-Composition feels natural in JS.